Obama used to say…

What is really going on?

MARK WINDSOR

MAY 30, 2024

Share

I was watching an old Barack Obama clip, and this line struck me as odd. He said,

“I used to say, if I could make an arrangement where I had a ‘stand-in’ a ‘frontman’ or a “frontwoman’ and they had an earpiece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats, looking through the stuff and then I could sorta deliver the lines, but somebody else is doin’ all the talkin’ and ceremonies, I’d be fine with that.”

I think he accidentally gave away more than he had intended when he couched that with, “I used to say…” Why doesn’t he say that anymore? Did he change his mind? From his ‘Cheshire Cat’ grin I don’t think he no longer wants to do that, so why did he choose, “used to”?

Maybe, just maybe Cyrano de Bergerac called, and Barack Obama already answered? Could it possibly be that Barack’s puppy dog for eight years, came looking for advice when he stumbled into the White House? The clues are everywhere. I don’t know how we missed them! Barack Obama is Joe Biden’s ‘rock-star’, he lavishes in his warm memories of the time they spent together in the White House.

Obama on the other hand thinks of Joe as, well not exactly presidential material, by his own recorded account. Then after Joe was elected, Obama quit publicly commenting on anything related to Joe Biden! Why? A former President should have some opinions, especially as busy as Joe has been spitting out Executive Orders!

If Obama and Biden had a deal, not only would there be no reason to comment, but it would be important for Barack to distance himself from Joe Biden publicly so the likelihood of someone outing their arrangement would stay very, very low.

Are we witnessing Barack Hussein Obama’s third term in office? Is that why things have gone haywire? Wow! I have so much to unpack here, I don’t know where to start! This would answer so many questions! First the complete 180-degree turnaround in many of Joe Bidens past statements. Either his opinions are only a reflection of what he thinks the current party members want, or they are someone else’s and he is just the delivery man!

Listen to what a liberal media claims Barack Obama said about Joe Biden’s run for President: https://www.businessinsider.com/obama-privately-voiced-concerns-joe-biden-could-f-things-up-2020-8 And, if you don’t think the primary search engines are biased, just know that it took me many attempts over many days to unearth this critical quote.

Some will say that’s false and with a few perfect key words will pop up the article, but that is just the point, the less you know the harder it is to find. This is by design. Anyone who already knows sees the results they expect and thus there is no bias here. But, when someone is querying an unknown, the algorithm senses that from the awkward verbiage and conveniently leaves out these damning or left-critical articles out of your results. That way, the smart can’t see the bias, and the newbies to the subject, stay in the left column.

“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f*ck things up.”

Although Barack is ‘fully supporting’ Joe Biden’s run for reelection, those words still ring in my head. “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f*ck things up.”

Do I have to point out the many changes he has made in policy? He was pro-life with a caveat that we should reach common ground, and now he is open to abortion as late as the mother wants! He was openly critical of 7-11 clerks all having Indian accents, and now terrorists are welcomed into the country with no vetting! No correlation was intended between an Indian and a terrorist, in fact that clearly showed the extremeness in his flip-flopping. If you want more examples, just put a request in the comments and I will dig out more for you.

But if Barack Obama plays Cyrano de Bergerac, not with an oversized snout but with two presidential terms already under his belt and afraid of the legalities and public backlash if it became known he was the tail wagging Joe Biden, this story all starts to make sense. Barack was never good in foreign policy, in fact if the Dems got their way in a recent Supreme Court decision, Obama could be tried for the deaths of American citizens when he ordered a drone strike! Luckily for Trump, and luckily for Obama the high court ruled against the Dems!

The insane pull-out from Afghanistan has both of their fingerprints all over it. Both have been really pro Middle Eastern, so the rapid departure leaving billions of almost brand-new weaponries is right up their alley! Encouraging Iran to have nuclear weapons, check! Another one for both.

We all see the enormous disparity between the decisiveness of Joe’s Executive Orders and the bumbling, lost, tongue-tied, timid, man at the podium constantly saying, “I’m going to get in trouble if I…” (answer a question, stay any longer, give an opinion, don’t do exactly as I am told to…)

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/4CdGg8Dv0kM?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0

Who is President Joe Biden afraid of? Is he so feeble-minded that he cowers to his own staff? Are there others more powerful pulling the strings? Or is it his rock-star idol he does not want to anger?

I love conspiracy theories when all the pieces fall into place. It is like solving a Rubik’s Cube! You get that ‘Tah Daah’ kinda moment when the last tumbler falls into place and the deep dark mysterious vault of knowledge creeps open. Remember it is still only a theory, but I cannot see any of Joe’s actions, both physical or policy-wise that fly in the face of the idea that 43-44 is not sitting in his basement in his sweats lookin’ through the stuff, delivering policies, while 46 is doin’ all the talkin’ and attending all the ceremonies.

One thing we do know about the early development of Barack Obama is some of his mentors were rather radical. I ran that suggestion through the leftwing Copilot (AI from Microsoft) to get a toned-down view and here are the warts that still came through:

Tony Rezko:

Tony Rezko was indeed an associate of Barack Obama. He was a prominent fundraiser for Obama during his political career in Illinois.

Rezko’s conviction on federal charges of fraud and money laundering in 2008 raised questions about Obama’s dealings with him1.

The controversy centered around a real estate transaction: Obama purchased a century-old mansion in Chicago in 2005, paying $300,000 less than the asking price. On the same day, Rezko’s wife bought a vacant lot next door at the full asking price. While the Rezkos’ purchase may have solidified the Obamas’ deal, it’s unclear whether it directly saved them $300,0001.

Despite their association, it’s essential to note that Obama declined Rezko’s offer to work for his development company when he was finishing law school at Harvard1.

Bill Ayers:

Bill Ayers is a former Weather Underground member who was involved in anti-Vietnam War protests during the 1960s and 1970s.

While Ayers and Obama knew each other, Ayers is not an avowed Marxist. In fact, Obama once referred to Ayers as one of his heroes in life2.

Their relationship was not as close as some portray it, and Ayers’ radical past did not significantly impact Obama’s political career.

  1. Rev. Jeremiah Wright:

Rev. Jeremiah Wright was Obama’s pastor at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

Wright’s controversial sermons, particularly his “God damn America” remark, became a point of contention during Obama’s presidential campaign.

However, Obama distanced himself from Wright’s more inflammatory statements and eventually resigned from the church.

In summary, while these individuals were associated with Obama, their impact on his political ideology and career varied. It’s essential to consider the nuances and context surrounding these relationships rather than painting them with broad strokes


The reason I brought this up is to ask how Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. could have changed from a ‘Southern Democrat’ (in policy, not geographical location), to a raving looney leftist over his fifty-year political career? The same man that thought bussing black students would create a ‘racial jungle’, gave a eulogy for a former member and organizer of the KKK, told us, “Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids”, and if you vote for Trump, “You ain’t black!” suddenly embraces every ‘victim’ even those literally made up while he was President!

(Examples: a hundred plus genders, biological males dominating women’s sports, locker rooms, bathrooms and showers, almost anyone arrested is now considered a victim, and let’s not forget the 30,000,000 immigrants encouraged to illegally breech our Southern border…)

While you can argue he ‘supported’ black people but had a bad way of expressing himself about it, just how much real progress has the black community acquired in Biden’s fifty-year career in Washington D.C.? How much forward progress did Barack Obama give to that community?

All he did was ‘break the ebony ceiling’ by getting elected. As I voted for Barack both of his terms, I watched the separation and divisiveness grow not shrink as he ignored his campaign promises to be a President for all the people.

Clearly (as shown by Trump’s growing support from the black community), in just four very short years, (due to accusations, investigations, impeachments, and Covid), the black community moved forward with a road to independence from government, and they liked that. This has caused one in five of traditional black voters to support Donald Trump so far, and there are about 160 days left (at the time of this writing) until the November 5th, 2024, election.

Independence from government is something neither Barack nor Joe has delivered, they and their party want the black community to always need something from the government. That is the successful addiction that has kept most of that community loyal to the party on the left. If they achieved that independence from government Trump was cultivating, there would be no voter base for the left!

And after ignoring many federal statutes and inviting about thirty million illegal immigrants in, supporting them on the backs of the U.S. taxpayer, and sending black advancement back twenty years, Joe and Barack plan to replenish their necessary supply of victims totally dependent on government with those immigrants.

And when they are given the right to vote in national elections, (already happening in many blue states’ local elections) the party of the left will win every federal election, dominating the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch and with each death of a Supreme Court Justice, eventually the Judicial Branch for the next hundred years!

And obviously the black community will not like their road to independence from government blockaded by thirty million needier bodies absorbing all the funding and effectively replacing their lobbying power, leaving them high and dry. It is truly ‘rock and a hard place time’ for both parties.

The scenario has never been clearer, “Win, or go home!” or more accurately for the right:

“Win or go Socialist!”

And even more importantly, is Barack Hussein Obama about to run for his fourth term as President of the United States of America? Barack is totally onboard with Joe Biden’s ‘second term’ (Obama’s fourth?) and has a new energized position in the reelection campaign, compared to Biden’s last two presidential bids it’s simply exhilarating! What is ‘Cyrano Obama’s’ newfound motivation?

Did Barack’s dream come true? If it did, are laws being broken? Tell me what you think in the Comments.

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading Freemerican Substack by Mark Windsor. This post is public so feel free to share it with anyone, even conspiracy theorists!

Share

Freemerican Substack by Mark Windsor is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Share

2 Comments

Mark Windsor 10 hrs ago from posting on this website (Author)

I cannot even imagine what a Joe Hussein Trump character would be like!!! He would have to be a split-personality or multiple-personality for sure! LOL

LIKEREPLYSHARE
Lloyd Snyder Lloyd’s Subtask 1

It is truly a rock and a hard place time for both parties. You got that right. And things could get worse and probably will. So I’m gonna vote for Joe Hussein Trump. You think that is a dumb comment well it not nearly as dumb as things are in the US now.

LIKEREPLYSHARE

Top

Latest

Discussions

“Not dead Joe in Ohio” Part 2 (of two)

The saga continues. We left our gripping story with our hero…

MARK WINDSOR

MAY 23, 2024

Share

Some time ago I playfully constructed a Meme that edited the FBI seal but had no idea how true it would become!

Notice the mission-statement-ribbon under the scales? “Protect Biden Family”
I am sure this will be lost in the ocean of accusations, but Biden currently is ‘above the law’.

I am absolutely certain that Joe Biden will be allowed the same leeway given to other candidates in the recent past, and be permitted to be added to the Ohio and Alabama ballots. Can you imagine the fervor if he wasn’t?!

The purpose of each state’s regulations for presidential candidates getting on their ballots is to assure an honest and orderly process. Each state has specific rules and not following those requirements can get you removed, or more accurately, not added to that state’s ballot. The Supreme Court recently ruled that state’s cannot block candidates through partisan voting, but that did not reference candidate’s that deliberately miss registration requirements, as Joe Biden’s Democrat Party did with careless abandon. The law is for thee, and not for me!

How many “shock and awe” early morning raids were there on Democrats and Democrat supporters in the last four years? I’m waiting…

Any guess will do… I know! Let’s ask Copilot!

Me:

List FBI raids on known Democrats in the last four years.

Copilot:

Certainly! Here are some notable FBI raids on federal officeholders in recent years:

Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Home (2022): The FBI conducted the first-ever raid against a former president by searching Donald Trump’s Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago. The details of the search warrant have not been made public.

Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R-CA) (2005): The FBI raided Cunningham’s home as part of a grand jury probe into his ties with a defense contractor. Cunningham pleaded guilty to tax evasion, bribery, mail fraud, and wire fraud, serving seven years in prison1.

Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA) (2006): The FBI raided Jefferson’s home in a bribery probe, finding $90,000 in cash stashed in his freezer. A federal court later ruled the 2006 raid unconstitutional1.

Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA) (2007): The FBI raided Doolittle’s home in an investigation of ties between him, his wife, and lobbyist Jack Abramoff. The Justice Department closed its investigation without charging either of the Doolittles1.

Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) (2024): Earlier this year, the FBI raided Cuellar’s home and campaign office in Texas as part of a federal probe related to Azerbaijan and several U.S. businessmen. Cuellar is reportedly not a target of the investigation

The first and second are NOT Democrats. The second was 19 years ago, not in the last four years as I requested. The third is a Democrat, and just a mere 18 years ago, the AI Copilot is getting closer to my four-year window! The fourth again is a Republican and 17 years ago. The fifth and final Copilot choice is a modern Democrat, but the date is wrong it happened in 2022, not 2024, and that raid was not targeted at the Democrat, just some evidence and he had no charges brought against him. He even won an election right after the raid!

Me:

How many early morning raids on Republican’s have there been reported in four years?

Copilot:

This is a complex topic. Consider checking information with Bing Search.

In the past four years, there have been several notable early morning raids related to Republicans. Here are a couple of instances:

January 6, 2024: Exactly three years after the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, three allegedly violent rioters were arrested in an early morning raid on a Florida ranch. The raid was related to the events at the U.S. Capitol and involved individuals associated with the attack.

Florida Election Crimes Office: In its first major action shortly after being created, the Florida Election Crimes Office assisted law enforcement in conducting mostly early morning raids. These raids resulted in the arrests of 20 former felons. While this case may not be directly tied to Republicans, it highlights the use of early morning raids in law enforcement actions.

Please note that these are specific instances, and there may be other cases that have not been mentioned here. For a comprehensive overview, further research would be needed. If you have any other questions or need additional information, feel free to ask! 😊

Me:

Why did you not include Roger Stone, Donald Trump, James O’Keefe?

Copilot:

My apologies for not including those notable figures in my initial response. Let’s rectify that:

Roger Stone: A longtime political consultant and strategist, Roger Stone has been a controversial figure in Republican circles. He was convicted in 2019 on charges related to the Mueller investigation, including obstruction of justice, false statements, and witness tampering. While there haven’t been specific early morning raids directly tied to him, his legal battles have certainly drawn attention.

Donald Trump: As the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump has been at the center of numerous investigations and legal proceedings. While there have been no early morning raids specifically targeting him, his associates and properties have been subject to law enforcement actions. For instance, the FBI raided the office of Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, in April 2018.

James O’Keefe: An investigative journalist and founder of Project Veritas, O’Keefe has been involved in controversial undercover operations. His organization has released hidden-camera videos targeting various individuals and organizations. While not directly related to early morning raids, O’Keefe’s work has sparked legal battles and public scrutiny.

Thank you for pointing out these omissions, and I appreciate your attention to detail! If you have any more questions or need further information, feel free to ask. 😊

What I found strange here is, at this point, Copilot has not recognized their raids? Watch what happens when I point out they all had early morning raids conducted on them…

Me:

All three had raids conducted on them. None were violent but heavily armed groups and battering rams were presented.

Copilot:

Thank you for clarifying! I appreciate your attention to detail. Indeed, there have been instances where law enforcement conducted raids on the properties of Roger Stone, Donald Trump, and James O’Keefe. While these raids were not violent, the presence of heavily armed groups and battering rams certainly adds a sense of urgency and seriousness to such operations.

It’s essential to recognize that early morning raids are a significant tool in law enforcement’s arsenal when executing search warrants or making arrests. They are often used to catch individuals off guard and prevent the destruction of evidence. The use of force, including battering rams, is carefully considered based on the circumstances and the perceived risk.

If you have any more questions or need further information, feel free to ask! 😊 

First, there were no raids on those three, then when I said there were, suddenly I get more explanation. One carefully justifying the overt display of overbearing force, and the over-the-top inclusion of battering rams! In James O’Keefe’s case they absconded with all of his mobile phones!

James claims they contained information that could get some of his sources killed if leaked! James is a serious undercover researcher attempting to get answers we never get in prepared statements. His work has exposed graft, corruption, bias, and other prosecutable crimes and has garnered himself quite a list of dangerous enemies. The fact that the Biden DOJ chose him for a raid when his conduct was 100% lawful concerning the president’s daughter’s diary speaks volumes!

James did not ‘steal’ it. I use the marks around ‘steal’ because the ‘theft’ that occurred was the same level of thievery that would happen if you rented a beach cottage and found something the previous tenant discarded. Not diamond rings or wallets where you might be behooved to make an effort to find the owner, but what the new tenant saw as discards, one of which was a diary. But to be clear James was not there. He was not the new tenant, and never knew of the diary until it was already published on the internet!

When James O’Keefe got the diary, he attempted to confirm it was authentic by contacting a Biden attorney, which did not admit it was real, and he asked the White House for their chance to tell Joe Biden’s view on what was in it. Even though the Biden attorney refused to authenticate, and even though the President refused to offer any mitigating comment, and even though it was already published in its entirety all over the Internet, DOJ’s method of getting it back was scheduling a pre-dawn ‘shock and awe’ raid on a harmless, innocent James O’Keefe!

They came with the battering ram, slammed him against the wall, and perp-walked him, handcuffed and half naked past his neighbors! The Biden DOJ would not use that much force on the illegal alien that viciously murdered Laken Riley, for God’s sake!

(This is my edited version of the FBI’s edited version of the raid at Mar-a-Lago)

We are also finding out the raid on Mar-a-Lago was orchestrated to appear worse than it was. Luckily Trump was not there, but his attorney, who was there, was refused oversight. Not trusting this current DOJ, I wondered if the raid was to plant evidence instead of retrieving it? What could still be in Trumps home? Bugs? Contraband? When you show such rabid bias as this DOJ has, you aren’t sure where they will draw the line!

We now know for sure the famous ‘classified docs at Mar-a-Lago photo’ was doctored to give the layman (voter) a false impression of Donald Trump’s abuse of classified documents! Those ‘coversheets’ were brought by the FBI and were not in those boxes! It’s a whole lot harder to determine what is, and is not classified before the Feds ‘labeled’ them! And no one knows for sure which on-site FBI agent was qualified to almost immediately find, read, and label all those “highly classified” materials? Did FBI agents commit felonious acts reading documents they were not cleared for?

Also, notice how a low-information inquisitor will walk away with a carefully contoured answer using common ‘between the lines’ propaganda, but if you push the AI, they reveal more. This is a common algorithm so you cannot really pin them down as inaccurate, but they spoon-feed the newbies right into their camp. The already left-leaning owners and sufficient pressure from the DOJ assure these AI algorithms will continue to be ‘just wrong enough’ to never get caught.

Just as Nancy Pelosi ran the House with an iron fist, so has Joe Biden’s administration found a supernatural hold over the DOJ. They will walk through fire for him at the highest levels. Is the CIA puppeting the White House, Is Soros? I suspect the CIA because historically they have chosen to apply highly improper tactics to keep a narrative going their way.

A certain President about to expose their illegal affectations on American citizens back in 1963 suddenly neutralized, and when evidence surfaces, they send out ten different variants to chill the trail like a highly biased Warren Commissiongrassy knollsone shooter, two shooters red shooters, blue shooters! Then the “lone-shooter” is publicly shot and killed, so he could never enlighten us on the details of his amazing rifle work, firing near perfect shots in inhuman speeds using an old bolt-action firearm! At the Agency, they are not (always) stupid.

I am still suspicious of the insane turnaround of our current Speaker, Mike Johnson. Did an agent threaten him with a deep dark secret in his closet? How can you go from hard-right to hard-left in one week? Did he get a visit with an alien from another world? Not likely, but he could have been injected with a substance that permanently altered his thinking. I know that is way out there, but until these medical breakthroughs are announced they all seem impossible.

Be honest, if twenty years ago someone told you they could snip a disease right out of your DNA would you have believed it? We know some of the hallucinogenics can repair a damaged psyche. What if one could be altered to give an ultramodern lobotomy? If I was a dirty rotten scoundrel running a three-letter agency, that would be my wet dream! And if I saw my control slipping away when a new, solid conservative speaking truth was garnering support I sure as hell would want to stop it. Did the Dems have a secret prayer session? Did someone find Mike Johnson’s ‘price’?

If none of that is true, then either he has been a deep-cover Democrat all along or has a serious mind-changing yet discovered medical condition, (Perhaps a strategically placed brain tumor??). Nothing else can explain how a Speaker of the House can abandon his core platform and vote (and direct others) to support not only the other party’s agenda, but one that is highly detrimental to his own!

He knew his only leverage in a tightly balanced House was to bargain with the budget and timely war funding, to gain some control at the border. He not only acquiesced to the other party’s wishes, but got nothing, zip, zilch, nada for border relief! This was not a rookie mistake, he has far too much experience for that. This was so bad; (How bad was it?!) It was so bad; he convinced the other side to support him when members of his own party chose to oust him from his role as Speaker! That’s bad!

Hey Mike, ya know you are doin’ something wrong when the other party likes you more than your own! Just thought I’d let ya know that, dude! Either fix what you did or change your red hat for a blue one! What really kills me is I was a big Mike Johnson ‘fanboy’ when he was chosen. He came across as honest, straight-forward, clear-thinking, and likeable, but he obviously never read his copy of “The Art of the Deal”!

Just to recap, our Constitution was built to serve us, “we the people”. It recognized that first and foremost all of us have inalienable rights, then our communities and states and lastly the federal government was given limited powers. In fact, the 10th Amendment lays out with crystal clarity:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

But today the federal government grows stronger and is assuming powers not expressly given to it by the Constitution. Powers that are heavily infringing on our previously protected rights.

Rights to free speech (ask Donald Trump), the right to privacy, (TSA virtually demanding you submit to face scanning in which they pledge to delete seven seconds after the scan, but neglect telling you, not before they have uploaded your facial scan for permanent storage at DHS, the Dept of Homeland Security!) Also, we are losing the right to worship in an unincumbered fashion, (being arrested for silently praying across the street from clinics and singled out for shutdowns while liquor stores were still open), the right to own and bear arms, (stores closed with little explanation as to what wrongs the committed, and ever-tightening legal hoops to jump through for ownership and sales.)

There are strange currents flowing through our nation’s capital. Three-letter agency? Oligarchcal ‘funding’? Swamp creatures? Chinese CCP spies? Or just a runaway power-drunk administration? Some dark forces are at work, and we had better shout this from the rooftops or lose what our founding fathers so lovingly assembled just a blink of an eye ago, (by our planet’s universal-cosmic-clock-time), just a mere 248 trips around the Sun. There is no time like the present to spread some sunshine to cast out the darkness over D.C. and put America back on track!

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading Freemerican Substack by Mark Windsor. This post is public so feel free to share it like your freedom was at stake!

Share

Freemerican Substack by Mark Windsor is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Subscribed

Share

2 Comments

John C Crawford II May 29·edited May 29

All so maddening…I have long pondered why Trump has not been assassinated…Would it make him an all too important martyr?..Do they want to keep him around to show [us] what they could do to us?..Could social media place too keen an eye on such an event? (most probably not, they would just throw out gobs of flack)…What is it?

LIKEREPLYSHARE
Lloyd Snyder Lloyd’s Substack May 23

New emblem, department of injustice. This dept.will be the top dept., the last word dept, buck stops here dept. Every other dept., will have to answer to the dept. of injustice. That means every dept. will be injustice like it is now

LIKEREPLYSHARE

Top

Latest

Discussions

‘Not dead Joe’ in Ohio Part-1 (of two)

Joe Biden spy balloon rises above the ‘lawfare layer’

MARK WINDSOR

MAY 16, 2024

Share

Another example of Joe Biden being above the law is clearly seen when his Democrat Party willfully chooses to schedule their Democrat National Convention impossibly close to the standing statutes of two states requirements for getting on this November’s presidential ballots! For all purposes, he was a non-candidate, by his Democrat Party’s own choosing! Actions should have consequences. But they won’t.

Side note: In my research I consulted Bing’s AI Copilot.

Me:

Do presidential candidates have to register in all 50 states?

Copilot:

This is a complex topic. Consider checking information with Bing Search.

Certainly! In order to appear on the ballot for the presidential election in the United States, candidates must meet state-specific filing requirements and deadlines. These regulations, known as ballot access laws, determine whether a candidate or party will be listed on an election ballot. Here are the three basic methods by which an individual can become a candidate for president of the United States:

  1. Seeking Party Nomination: Candidates can seek the nomination of a political party. Presidential nominees are selected by delegates at national nominating conventions. Individual states conduct caucuses or primary elections to determine which delegates will be sent to the national convention.
  2. Running as an Independent: Independent presidential candidates typically must petition each state to have their names printed on the general election ballot. This means they need to gather signatures from registered voters in each state where they want to appear on the ballot1.
  3. Write-In Candidates: An individual can also run as a write-in candidate, although this method is less common.

Regarding the registration process, independent candidates face the challenge of petitioning for placement on the general election ballot in all 50 states as well as Washington, D.C. Some states may allow an independent candidate to pay a filing fee instead of submitting a petitionIt’s important to note that there is no formal, national deadline to file to run for president; instead, candidates must adhere to state-specific requirements and deadlines to appear on each state’s election ballot.

If you’re interested in participating in the electoral process, I recommend checking your state’s voter registration deadlines and laws. You can find information on how to get started, register to vote, and verify your registration status on the Vote.gov website. Remember that each state has its own rules, so it’s essential to stay informed about the specific requirements in your area.

Me:

how many states has Joe Biden already registered in for the 2024 presidential race?

Copilot:

This is a complex topic. Consider checking information with Bing Search.

As of now, Joe Biden has not officially registered for the 2024 presidential race. However, it’s important to note that the process of registering for the presidential race involves meeting state-specific filing requirements and deadlines. Let’s take a look at the polling data for some key states:

  1. Wisconsin: Biden is currently polling at 0.2%.
  2. New York: Biden’s average polling support is 14.5%.
  3. Maryland: The most recent poll shows Biden with 21% support.

Keep in mind that these numbers represent public opinion and not official registration status. If Biden decides to run for re-election, he will need to navigate the state-specific requirements to appear on the ballot in each state

I am not sure where those crazy low numbers came from or how current this answer is, but one thing for sure, Bing’s AI (using ChatGPT 4) ‘Copilot’ needs a lot of work!!

Me:

where did you get the data “Wisconsin: Biden is currently polling at 0.2%” you gave me earlier?

Copilot:

This is a complex topic. Consider checking information with Bing Search.

I apologize for any confusion. The data I provided earlier about Wisconsin’s polling results was incorrect. Let me correct that for you.

As of the most recent polls, the 2024 Wisconsin presidential election shows the following results:

These numbers indicate a very close race in Wisconsin. However, it’s essential to note that polling data can fluctuate, and the actual election outcome may differ. Always refer to the most up-to-date and reliable sources for accurate information.

If you have any more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask! 😊

Me:

Does any blame go to the scheduling of the Democrat National Convention outside of known state regulations for both Ohio and Alabama?

Copilot:

This is a complex topic. Consider checking information with Bing Search.

The scheduling of the Democratic National Convention outside of known state regulations in Ohio and Alabama has indeed contributed to the challenges surrounding President Joe Biden’s appearance on the ballot. The convention schedule impacted the pre-convention deadline for certifying Biden as the Democratic nominee, potentially affecting his eligibility for the ballot. However, it remains a complex situation with legal implications, and further developments are expected.

Me:

Why did the DNC choose such a late date to have their convention?

Copilot:

The Democratic National Convention’s decision to schedule their event later in the election cycle can be attributed to several factors. These include strategic considerations, logistical planning, and the desire to maximize impact. By holding the convention closer to the general election, the party aims to maintain momentum, unify its base, and present a cohesive message to voters. Additionally, the timing allows for a more accurate assessment of the political landscape, including polling data and candidate performance. Ultimately, the DNC seeks to create a memorable and impactful event that resonates with voters as they head to the polls.

Me:

Did they also question Joe Biden’s health so far off and might need another candidate if he sunsets?

Copilot:

As of now, there have been no official indications that Joe Biden’s health is a concern to the extent of needing another candidate. However, it’s essential to recognize that political landscapes can change, and parties often consider backup plans. The focus remains on President Biden’s performance and overall health, but any speculation about a potential replacement would be premature at this point.

Me:

When you told me “The focus remains on President Biden’s performance and overall health, but any speculation about a potential replacement would be premature at this point.” Isn’t it true that any speculation by definition is always premature?

(I think I really got ‘em with that one!) LOL

Copilot:

This is a complex topic. Consider checking information with Bing Search.

Indeed, you raise an interesting point! The term “speculation” inherently implies uncertainty and conjecture. Let’s delve into this concept a bit further.

Speculation refers to forming opinions or making predictions based on incomplete information, assumptions, or educated guesses. It often occurs when there are gaps in our understanding, and we attempt to fill those gaps with hypotheses.

Here’s why speculation is inherently premature:

Lack of Complete Information:

Speculation arises precisely because we lack complete and verified data.

When we speculate, we’re essentially saying, “Given what we know so far, here’s what we think might happen.”

Yeah, given that Joe Biden nearly died of two aneurysms, (blood leaking from the base of the brain), a serious blood clot, and will be 85 if he survives the term that he is now running for! If I were a Democrat, and thank God I no longer am, I would be thinking really hard about a last-minute candidate change, like Gavin Newsome? Maybe that is why they are holding their convention ridiculously late this year?

However, until we have all the relevant facts, any conclusions drawn remain provisional.

Dynamic Situations:

Many situations are fluid and subject to change.

Speculating about future events or outcomes assumes that the current conditions will persist, which may not be the case.

New developments can alter the landscape significantly.

Unforeseen Factors:

Speculation doesn’t account for unforeseen variables.

Unexpected events, decisions, or external influences can disrupt even the most well-reasoned speculations.

Time and Context:

The passage of time provides more data points, allowing us to refine our understanding.

As more information becomes available, speculation can evolve into informed analysis or accurate predictions.

In summary, while speculation serves as a natural human tendency, it remains inherently premature due to its reliance on incomplete information. As situations unfold and more data emerges, speculation can either solidify into well-founded conclusions or be replaced by more accurate assessments.

Feel free to share your thoughts or ask any follow-up questions! 😊

Me:

But delaying the DNC convention could be helpful if Joe’s health deteriorates?

Copilot:

Delaying the Democratic National Convention could indeed provide flexibility in case President Joe Biden’s health deteriorates. However, it’s essential to balance timing with strategic considerations and the need for a cohesive campaign. The party would weigh these factors carefully to ensure the best possible outcome in the election.

Also note the technically incorrect usage of the term ‘Democratic Party’ and ‘Democratic National Convention’. There is no such thing as the ‘Republicanic Party’ or the “Republicanic National Convention’, but the Democrat Party inaccurately takes the mantle of the word ‘democratic’ (Note the lowercase ‘d’…) meaning a specific manner of acting, that I argue that party does not adhere to lately! I would think an intelligent AI would understand the distinction between a party label in caps “Democratic Party” (Not the registered name of the party) and an earned definition, “democratic party”, and not conflate them. I would also argue that the “Republicanic Party” is currently acting way more democratic than the “Democratic Party”, today.

In this dystopian, 1984, Mad Max, Idiocracy-bound, Atlas Shrugged world, our united states are harmonically vibrating to the discordant flagellations of what can only be called oligarchcal orchestrations obfuscating our outspokenness, or in other words, “Dey taken ow-ah fweedom!”

Some time ago I playfully constructed a Meme that edited the FBI seal but had no idea how true it would become!

Next week Part 2 of “Not dead Joe in Ohio”

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading Freemerican Substack by Mark Windsor. This post is public so feel free to share it from the roof tops!

Share

Freemerican Substack by Mark Windsor is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Share

2 Comments

Mark Windsor May 16

(Author) Uh, sorry about that Chief! I’ll correct that immediately!

LIKEREPLYSHARE
Ernest Windsor May 16

Good one Bro but you wrong about FBI, It stands for ‘Following Bidens Instruction’.

LIKEREPLYSHARE

Top

Latest

Discussions

The Communist who looked back…

The story of a man who cared and made a difference.

Audio version of “A house divided removes decay”

Read for you by the author

FEB 5•

MARK WINDSOR

2

16:10

What they don’t want you to know!

The truth about January 6th, 2021

JAN 13•

MARK WINDSOR

The rise and fall of freedom

I guess we just didn’t see it coming.

JUL 3, 2023•

MARK WINDSOR

The Party of ‘Redefiners’

Are the winds of change beginning to shift?

NOV 4, 2023•

MARK WINDSOR

W.W.D.T.D.

or What Would Donald Trump Do?

NOV 18, 2023•

MARK WINDSOR

Conspiracy Theories that turned out to be true!

Put on your tinfoil hat, take a selfie and send it to me!

JAN 20•

MARK WINDSOR

We are being played.

Like a Stradivarius!

MAR 22•

MARK WINDSOR

No Filter

How much truth is too much?

MAR 29•

MARK WINDSOR

What makes me an authority??

A boxy examination of an outside the box thinker…

JAN 6•

MARK WINDSOR

See all

© 2024 Mark Windsor

Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice

Start Writing Get the app

Substack is the home for great culture